A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld a decision to dismiss a 
lawsuit by a farmer that challenged a law banning the inhumane 
confinement of egg-laying hens.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the 2012 decision by a 
lower court to throw out the lawsuit by egg farmer William Cramer. 
Cramer's lawsuit said the law is unconstitutionally vague.
It's the third time courts have rejected lawsuits by egg farmers against California's landmark Proposition 2.
"We are thrilled that the court sided with the millions of California 
voters who supported this measure and chose to end extreme and reckless 
factory farming practices," said Jonathan Lovvorn, senior vice president
 and chief counsel for animal protection litigation for the Humane 
Society of the United States.
The initiative approved in 2008 bans the inhumane confinement of 
egg-laying hens, breeding pigs and veal calves in cages so small the 
animals cannot stretch their limbs, lie down or turn around.Since its 
passage, farmers have complained that the measure lacks specific 
language designating appropriate cage size and as a result puts them at 
risk of misdemeanor charges and fines up to $1,000. 
In addition, they say they are on the hook for millions of dollars in 
upgrades but can't get bank loans without knowing whether new cages will
 be in compliance.
No comments:
Post a Comment